Mar. 8th, 2013

kribban: (Default)
I have noticed there are two types of feminists on the Internets:

There are the people who argue that the sum of feminism is believing that women and men should be equal, and that people who hold this belief are feminists whether they identify as such or not. (Real example: X said she is not a feminist, therefore she does not believe women should be equal to men.)

Then there are the people who argue that you can't be a feminist unless you meet a certain minimum criteria which are higher than just thinking men and women should be equal. (Real life example: You can't be a feminist unless you believe that gender differences are caused by social conditioning.)

If you buy the first definition all basically decent human beings are feminists. If you go by the second, feminism is a specific political identity shared by a group of people with specific ideological beliefs.

Group A argues that feminism speaks to our most basic and universally cherished ideals, while Group B argues that to be a feminist requires ideological commitment on a more narrow and deeper level.

And then you get to the even more complicated matter - how do you define equality? Equal rights and opportunities, or equal outcomes?

It gets even more frustrating when you realize that people assume that the definitions they're using are shared by everyone and that they shouldn't have to explain what they mean.

Profile

kribban: (Default)
Some kind of saviour

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 29th, 2025 02:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios